Wash. GOP state senator to propose bill criminalizing "illegal protests"

Republican state senator Doug Ericksen, who campaigned for President-elect Donald Trump, said Wednesday he plans to propose a bill for the upcoming legislative session that would take a firm stand against what he calls "illegal protests." (Photo: KOMO News)

OLYMPIA, Wash. - A Republican state senator who campaigned for President-elect Donald Trump said Wednesday he plans to propose a bill for the upcoming legislative session that would take a firm stand against what he calls "illegal protests."

Sen. Doug Ericksen of Ferndale said in a news release his bill would create a new crime of "economic terrorism" and would allow felony prosecution of people involved in protests that block transportation and commerce, damage property, threaten jobs and put public safety at risk, he said.

"I respect the right to protest, but when it endangers people's lives and property, it goes too far," Ericksen said. "Fear, intimidation and vandalism are not a legitimate form of political expression. Those who employ it must be called to account."

But some people believe the term "economic terrorism" goes too far.

"To call it economic terroism is just another way to silence it and another way to gain popular support." said Seattle resident Molly Boord.

"Frankly, I'm appauled," said Seattle city councilman Miked O'Brien.

He was detained by the Coast Guard when he joined kayaktivists protesting a Shell oil rig last summer.

"To me (it) strikes a complete disregard of the US constitution and our First Amendment rights," said O'Brien. "Our country is based, in part, on the ability to have free speech and public dissension."

Since Trump won the election last week, thousands of people have taken to the streets nationwide to condemn his comments about muslims, people in the country illegally and crude references to women.

American Civil Liberties Union of Washington spokesman Doug Honig told The Associated Press Wednesday that while they'll need to see an actual bill, Ericksen's statement throws out a lot of broad rhetoric.

"We're already concerned that some of its loose terms appear to be targeting civil disobedience as "terrorism." That's the kind of excessive approach to peaceful protest that our country and state do not need. Let's keep in mind that civil rights protesters who sat down at lunch counters could be seen as "disrupting business" ''and "obstructing economic activity," and their courageous actions were opposed by segregationists as trying to "coerce" business and government," Honig said.

Ericksen said his bill also would apply to people who fund and organize such protests.

"We are not just going after the people who commit these acts of terrorism," Ericksen said. "We are going after the people who fund them."

The bill, if proposed and passed through the GOP-controlled Senate, likely would face serious obstacles in the current Democratic-controlled House.

close video ad
Unmutetoggle ad audio on off